The evolution of language models, however, has transformed in recent decades, driven by advancements in machine learning and deep learning. Today, we see two prominent branches: Large language models (LLMs) and Small language models (SLMs).
It is no news that language models are considered as one of the oldest aspects of research, especially in the field of natural language processing. The timeline of their development can be traced back to the 1950s, evolving from rule-based systems to statistical models. While these models were certainly innovative for their time, they suffered from some major flaws, the most important of which was their disconnect from the actual intricacies of language. This is however not the case as far as the history of language models is concerned. Over the past few decades, the narrative has changed, largely due to improvements in machine learning as well as deep learning techniques, networks, and models. Today, we depict two major branches: Large language models (LLMs) and Small language models (SLM).
For many years, primary language models relied heavily on rule-based approaches and statistical methods. These models, which relied on a hand-constructed framework, utilized probabilities of preceding word/phrase sequences to inform their next prediction. However, these early models faced severe limitations in generating reasonably meaningful responses by the intricate nature of human language which embeds phrases and words in a structure that encompasses grammar, syntax, semantics and context.
This does not, however, imply that these primitive models did not have their uses; rather, they were the basis for more advanced techniques. Screenshots of neural networks particularly deep network-based approaches were the next significant development in the field of NLP. They began utilizing neural architecture tools with the objective to make models that can learn from the data and thus have no need for the rules to be designed in the first place. The game changer came when transformer models were presented. That was a game changing advancement for allowing computers to process and create natural language.
LLMs, particularly those built on the transformer architecture, demonstrated unprecedented performance in understanding and generating human-like text. Models like Google's BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) and OpenAI’s GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) series were at the forefront of this revolution. These models, trained on massive datasets from the internet, possess billions of parameters, allowing them to capture the nuance, context, and complexity of language at a level previously thought impossible.
For example, GPT-3, with its staggering 175 billion parameters, was a breakthrough. It could generate coherent and contextually accurate text, answer complex questions, perform reasoning tasks, and even engage in multi-turn conversations with the ability to "remember" prior exchanges within a session. Its capabilities stretched beyond mere text generation, it could translate languages, summarize lengthy documents, create content, and even generate computer code.
However, the power of LLMs came with a trade-off: the need for immense computational resources. Training and deploying models like GPT-3 requires significant hardware, including advanced GPUs or TPUs, a substantial amount of electricity, and lengthy training times. This makes LLMs accessible mostly to large organizations with the resources to develop and maintain them.
The significance of accessible language has been increasing, hence the interest in smaller models which are cheaper to develop has begun. These are SLMs, which are expected to work as efficiently and effectively as LLMs, but with more economical parameters, less computational intensity, and quicker training periods. SLMs range from several tens of millions and to under 30 billion parameters – quite a bit less than LLMs but a sufficiently amount for carrying out certain specialized operations.
For example, SLMs such as Mistral 7B and Meta’s LLaMA 3 have been developed and constructed with those specifications for usage within areas with greater emphasis on specific use cases. Although these models may not be as flexible as larger models like GPT-3, they are well-suited for cases with the greatest emphasis on time and cost. Many companies use SLMs in scenarios that require functionality within a narrow domain like a customer service chatbot, language translation of a very specific area, or text interpretation of a certain location.
Substitutability between LLMs and SLMs depends on weight interactions of capability versus cost. In particular, LLMs are best suited for complex tasks requiring extensive comprehension and multi-step reasoning due to their large number of parameters and plentiful assortment of data. They can be seamlessly integrated into any language-related task in order to serve as an all-purpose tool, for example, in a chatbot or for text analytics at scale. GPT-4’s integration in ChatGPT was developed into a commercial product and provided people with widely known tools like code authorship or text generation. To this day, In mid-2024, ChatGPT reported over more than 180M users, indicating a wide range of universality.
On the other hand, SLMs usually possess a clear advantage when tasks are narrowly defined or there is a scope restriction. Due to their substantial advantages in computational resource consumption, they are suitable for institutions that require prompt yet highly specialized solutions as there’s no need for massive model training or upkeep procedures. Higher inference speeds are claimed to be the benefit of models such as GTP-4o mini, in which case as much as 133 tokens can be processed in a second. Such SLM models’ strengths are however very specific in practice, for example LLaMA 3 by Meta alongside NVIDIA served to create medicine oriented SLMs.
Both LLMs and SLMs are applicable in numerous fields. Healthcare, for instance, requires highly accurate languid models since they are utilized in life-and-death scenarios real-time clinical information extraction and medical data translation to powering chatbots that engage patients. SLANT SIX AND LLaMA 3 (SURE learning and Meta AI Learning Abstraction three yes, that is a stretch) have been used in concert with health tech companies to accelerate these workflows; whereas models like Activ Surgical’s real-time surgical guidance platform or Mendel AI developed clinical data translation tools show some direct practical benefits of such systems in the field.
Language models are being evaluated in Vietnam by local organizations as well. SemiKong, an open-source LLM solution fine-tuned for the semiconductor industry of FPT Software is a fruit. When applied to semiconductor use-cases, this model has shown its superiority in delivering high performance with very cost-efficient utilities over other models including GPT-3 and LLaMA 3;
The choice between LLMs and SLMs like the decision of whether to adopt them in this case or not is often just a matter of practicality on an organizational basis. LLMs are the clear choice for companies looking to harness top-tier performance across a broad spectrum of applications. However, for companies that are working on tailored domain-specific applications SLMs can provide quite an unbeatable edge in terms of time speed (implementation), efficiency, and cost configurations.
As machine learning and AI continue to evolve, so too will the capabilities of language models. LLMs and SLMs will likely benefit from advancements in model architecture, training techniques, and hardware. LLMs will become more efficient, lowering the barriers to their use for smaller organizations, while SLMs will likely continue to improve their specialization and speed.
Ultimately, the future lies in finding the right balance. As organizations increasingly adopt AI-driven tools to optimize processes and drive innovation, selecting the appropriate model will depend on the task at hand. Whether through the immense power of LLMs or the streamlined efficiency of SLMs, language models are set to play an ever-expanding role across industries, shaping the future of technology and human interaction.
The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to go beyond them into the impossible.